fix: share SQLite connection pools across storage instances #516
+165
−47
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…tion Tests verify: - Multiple storage instances share one pool (avoids "too many open files") - Pragmas apply to all connections, not just the first
Prevents fd exhaustion when multiple SqliteStorage instances target the same database file.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Using macOS
15.7.3I was hitting "too many open files" runningsurfpool start --no-tui --db ./surfnet.sqliteSame fix as postgres - share pools across storage instances. Pragmas now go through r2d2's CustomizeConnection.
Tests in 8b61fc8 show the issue and verify the fix.