OCPBUGS-74530: Remove StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy featuregate

[gnufied]

fixes https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-74530

[openshift-ci-robot]

@gnufied: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74530, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.22.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.22.0)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (wduan@redhat.com), skipping review request.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

fixes https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-74530

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@gnufied: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

• 928557d|Remove StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy featuregate: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@gnufied: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

• ac90590|UPSTREAM: : Remove StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy featuregate: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

[JoelSpeed]

/lgtm

[gnufied]

Failures look unrelated to the change.

/retest-required

[benluddy]

/approve
/remove-label backports/unvalidated-commits

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: benluddy, gnufied, JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• DOWNSTREAM_OWNERS [benluddy]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[gnufied]

/retest-required

[gnufied]

/retest-required

[gnufied]

/retest-required

[JoelSpeed]

/verified by E2E

[openshift-ci-robot]

@JoelSpeed: This PR has been marked as verified by E2E.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by E2E

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 0a955cc and 2 for PR HEAD ac90590 in total

[gnufied]

/retest-required

[JoelSpeed]

/retest-required

[gnufied]

/retest-require

[openshift-ci-robot]

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 9d52131 and 1 for PR HEAD ac90590 in total

[openshift-ci]

@gnufied: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-crun-wasm	ac90590	link	true	/test e2e-aws-crun-wasm

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.