Skip to content

NETOBSERV-2611: add tar to dockerfiles#462

Open
jotak wants to merge 2 commits intonetobserv:mainfrom
jotak:add-tar
Open

NETOBSERV-2611: add tar to dockerfiles#462
jotak wants to merge 2 commits intonetobserv:mainfrom
jotak:add-tar

Conversation

@jotak
Copy link
Member

@jotak jotak commented Feb 6, 2026

Description

  • Add tar to dockerfiles
  • Use ubi-minimal upstream too

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

  • Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
  • Does this PR require product documentation?
    • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
  • Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
    • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
  • Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
    • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
  • QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
    • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
    • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
    • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 6, 2026

@jotak: This pull request references NETOBSERV-2611 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Description

  • Add tar to dockerfiles
  • Use ubi-minimal upstream too

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

  • Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
  • Does this PR require product documentation?
  • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
  • Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
  • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
  • Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
  • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
  • QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
  • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
  • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
  • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jotak jotak requested a review from Amoghrd February 6, 2026 10:09
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 6, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign oliviercazade for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jotak jotak requested a review from leandroberetta February 6, 2026 14:08
@Amoghrd
Copy link
Member

Amoghrd commented Feb 6, 2026

/retest

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026

New image:
quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-cli:2ca77f3

It will expire after two weeks.

To use this build, update your commands using:

USER=netobserv VERSION=2ca77f3 make commands

or download the updated commands.

Copy link
Contributor

@leandroberetta leandroberetta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Feb 6, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 6, 2026

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026

New image:
quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-cli:ceaffda

It will expire after two weeks.

To use this build, update your commands using:

USER=netobserv VERSION=ceaffda make commands

or download the updated commands.

@Amoghrd
Copy link
Member

Amoghrd commented Feb 6, 2026

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 6, 2026

@jotak: This pull request references NETOBSERV-2611 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Description

  • Add tar to dockerfiles
  • Use ubi-minimal upstream too

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

  • Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
  • Does this PR require product documentation?
  • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
  • Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
  • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
  • Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
  • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
  • QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
  • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
  • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
  • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 6, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 13.18%. Comparing base (7885b72) to head (533ea47).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #462   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   13.18%   13.18%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines        2443     2443           
=======================================
  Hits          322      322           
  Misses       2095     2095           
  Partials       26       26           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 13.18% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants