Align GitLab CI with dev workflow and patch brace-expansion

[llun]

Summary

• align .gitlab-ci.yml behavior with .github/workflows/dev.yml
• add test job on push and main-only sample job with needs: [test]
• update transitive brace-expansion in yarn.lock from 2.0.1 to 2.0.2 to address GHSA-v6h2-p8h4-qcjw

Validation

• yarn test

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @llun, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the project's continuous integration pipeline by restructuring the GitLab CI configuration to better reflect the development and deployment process. It also includes an important security update for a transitive dependency.

Highlights

• GitLab CI Workflow Alignment: The GitLab CI configuration has been refactored to align with the development workflow, introducing separate test and sample stages.
• CI Job Additions: A new test job now runs on every push, and a sample job, which uses node --import tsx, is configured to run only on the main branch.
• Dependency Update: The transitive dependency brace-expansion in yarn.lock has been updated from version 2.0.1 to 2.0.2 to address a known security vulnerability (GHSA-v6h2-p8h4-qcjw).

Changelog

• .gitlab-ci.yml
  • Defined workflow rules to trigger pipelines only on push events.
  • Introduced test and sample stages for better pipeline organization.
  • Added a default section to enable corepack before script execution.
  • Created a test job to run yarn install and yarn test.
  • Implemented a sample job, dependent on test, to execute a sample script using node --import tsx, restricted to the main branch.
  • Removed the previous pages job and its associated build and deploy logic.
• yarn.lock
  • Upgraded the brace-expansion package from 2.0.1 to 2.0.2.
  • Updated the integrity checksum for the brace-expansion package.

Activity

• No human activity has been recorded on this pull request yet.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates the GitLab CI pipeline to better align with the development workflow by introducing test and sample stages. It also patches the brace-expansion dependency to version 2.0.2 to address a security vulnerability.

My review focuses on the GitLab CI changes. While the new structure with test and sample jobs is a good direction, the sample job's script executes a file (index.ts) that is tightly coupled with the GitHub Actions environment, which will likely cause failures in GitLab CI. Additionally, the pipeline's performance can be improved by caching dependencies between jobs. I've added specific comments with details and suggestions.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: b942d1d940

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".