Skip to content

Conversation

@dennisdegreef
Copy link
Contributor

This closes #74

Implemented JMSSerializer instead of custom (un)serialize calls.

@lonelypullrequests I'd love to have some feedback on this!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Whoops, forgot about this one, need to move this to a separate file

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Replace serializer with JMS

1 participant