Modifications for network stack performance testing#82
Open
martinkarsten wants to merge 4 commits intogoogle:masterfrom
Open
Modifications for network stack performance testing#82martinkarsten wants to merge 4 commits intogoogle:masterfrom
martinkarsten wants to merge 4 commits intogoogle:masterfrom
Conversation
… remove log files.
|
Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information. For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While neper is primarily a networking benchmark tool, it looks like it is also often used for network stack performance testing. These are various suggestions for improvements for this use case:
'Optimistic' I/O: A lot of applications used this pattern by which a server does not check epoll first before writing a response to a socket.
'Discard': For some reason, it seems the first (1,N?) measurements in the RR experiments are way off. Not sure whether those are just cold-start effects or something else is amiss. However, it does distort the latency measurements.
'Busywait': This mode allows using busywaiting across epoll and napi busypolling. A special case (0 < N < 1000) can be used for epoll busywaiting without napi busypolling.
The Makefile changes are just for good measure.