Conversation
|
@AlisCode This impl still requires |
|
@tisonkun Yes, for example embedded development.
In the case of development for an esp32 for example, you can use |
|
To add to that : I believe it is theoretically possible to go no-alloc by using |
|
Thanks for your explanation! In my use case, I can have std always available. So I'd keep I'll review this changeset later this month (feel free to ping me if I miss this target). cc @andylokandy do you foresee some cases we could have hard dependencies on |
|
anyhow supports |
|
I'm going to rebase this onto the main branch, and add a chaneglog file to denote the no_std support, and emphasize that this is a nice-to-have feature that I do not promise to keep it in the following major versions. Before 1.0, when the APIs of |
tisonkun
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM.
We may update the README.md for further no_std support details.
@andylokandy I'm going to merge this patch in hours or tomorrow.
|
Docs updated also. |
Contents
This PR brings support for
no-stdinexnso that the crate can be used on e.g. embedded devices.allocis still required because of implementation details. At a glance, no-alloc should be possible but is out of scope for this PR and most likely forexnitself.Fixes #21