-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Implement Chitty Cloud Repo Operator system #2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Implement complete technical specification for the CCRO including: - JSON Schemas (v1): - bias-fingerprint.json: Provenance metadata envelope for transparent trust - chitty-score.json: Multi-dimensional trust metric (Personal/Legal/State/Ethics) - justice-override.json: Antifragile learning loop for human overrides - merkle-proof.json: Cryptographic integrity proofs for ChittyChain - audit-event.json: OCSF-compliant audit logging - OpenAPI 3.1 Specification: - Trust operations (score retrieval, event ingestion) - Justice Protocol (override execution, precedent listing) - Verification (notary service) - Ledger (Merkle proofs, audit logs) - Blue Pill/Red Pill dual-mode transparency via X-Chitty-View-Mode header - Updated config-manifest.json with schema registry and capabilities - Documentation with architecture overview and usage guide
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a new OpenAPI spec, five strict JSON Schemas, an upgraded operator manifest (v2) with API/security/integrations/monitoring metadata, and a comprehensive README for the Chitty Cloud Repo Operator. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant CCRO as Chitty Cloud Repo Operator
participant TrustEngine as Trust Engine
participant Ledger
rect rgba(200,150,255,0.5)
Note over Client,Ledger: Trust Score Retrieval - Blue Pill Mode (simplified)
Client->>CCRO: GET /trust/score/{entityId} (X-Chitty-View-Mode: BLUE_PILL)
CCRO->>TrustEngine: Query cached aggregate score
TrustEngine-->>CCRO: BluePillScore
CCRO-->>Client: 200 OK + BluePillScore (X-Chitty-Integrity-Proof header)
end
rect rgba(100,200,100,0.5)
Note over Client,Ledger: Trust Score Retrieval - Red Pill Mode (full audit)
Client->>CCRO: GET /trust/score/{entityId} (X-Chitty-View-Mode: RED_PILL)
CCRO->>TrustEngine: Query full score & dimensions
CCRO->>Ledger: Fetch audit trail & merkle proof
TrustEngine-->>CCRO: ChittyScore (dimensions, meta)
Ledger-->>CCRO: Audit data & MerkleProof
CCRO-->>Client: 200 OK + ChittyScore (bias_fingerprint, integrity_proof)
end
sequenceDiagram
participant User as Human Reviewer
participant CCRO as Chitty Cloud Repo Operator
participant JusticeEngine as Justice Engine
participant Ledger
participant TrainingPipeline as ML Training Pipeline
User->>CCRO: POST /justice/override (override, justification, learning_directive)
CCRO->>JusticeEngine: Validate authority & scope
alt Authorization Succeeds
JusticeEngine->>Ledger: Record override & create precedent
Ledger-->>JusticeEngine: ledger_commitment
alt learning_directive.should_retrain = true
JusticeEngine->>TrainingPipeline: Trigger async retraining
TrainingPipeline-->>JusticeEngine: Ack job_id
end
JusticeEngine-->>CCRO: OverrideResponse (ledger_commitment, precedent_uri)
CCRO-->>User: 200 OK + OverrideResponse
else Authorization Fails
JusticeEngine-->>CCRO: 403 Forbidden
CCRO-->>User: 403 Forbidden
end
sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant CCRO as Chitty Cloud Repo Operator
participant BiasAnalyzer as Bias Analyzer
participant Ledger
participant Queue as Async Processing Queue
Client->>CCRO: POST /trust/event (event_data, bias_fingerprint)
CCRO->>BiasAnalyzer: Validate bias fingerprint
alt Validation Passes
CCRO->>Ledger: Persist event metadata
CCRO->>Queue: Enqueue for processing (QUEUED)
CCRO-->>Client: 202 Accepted (eventId, status: QUEUED)
Note over CCRO,Queue: Asynchronous Processing
Queue->>BiasAnalyzer: Process event (compute updates)
BiasAnalyzer->>Ledger: Update trust scores & audit trail
Queue->>Ledger: Mark event PROCESSED
else Validation Fails
CCRO-->>Client: 400 Bad Request + ErrorResponse
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~60 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. 🧹 Recent nitpick comments
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/api/openapi.yaml[high] 1-987: Ensure that security operations is not empty. (CKV_OPENAPI_5) [medium] 257-263: Ensure that arrays have a maximum number of items (CKV_OPENAPI_21) 🔇 Additional comments (13)
✏️ Tip: You can disable this entire section by setting Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: eedecf1092
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| BluePillScore: | ||
| type: object | ||
| description: Simplified score response for general UI consumption. | ||
| properties: | ||
| entity_id: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Require fields in BluePillScore to satisfy oneOf
The /trust/score/{entityId} response uses oneOf between ChittyScore and BluePillScore, but BluePillScore defines no required fields and allows extra properties. That means any Red Pill response will also match BluePillScore, causing oneOf validation to fail because both schemas match. Clients that validate responses or use generated SDKs will reject otherwise valid Red Pill responses. Consider adding required properties (e.g., entity_id, score, status) and/or additionalProperties: false, or switch to anyOf/a discriminator so the two variants are mutually exclusive.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/api/openapi.yaml`:
- Around line 1-56: Add a top-level security default to the OpenAPI document
(insert a top-level security: [...] block after the tags section) that
references your existing security schemes (e.g., the mTLS or ChittyID/OAuth2
scheme names defined in components.securitySchemes) so new endpoints inherit
protection; ensure endpoints meant to be public (like /health) keep an explicit
security: [] override.
In `@operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/README.md`:
- Around line 61-74: The README's directory-structure fenced code block is
missing a language specifier; update the opening fence for the block that begins
with "operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/" to include a language (use "text")
so the block becomes ```text, keeping the existing block content unchanged.
- Around line 9-30: The fenced ASCII diagram block in README.md lacks a language
specifier; update the opening fence from ``` to ```text so the diagram (the
ASCII architecture diagram block) is marked as plain text for consistent
rendering and linting compliance.
🧹 Nitpick comments (10)
operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/schemas/v1/merkle-proof.json (1)
22-40: Consider addingadditionalProperties: falseto nested objects for consistency.The root schema enforces
additionalProperties: false, but nested objects likesiblingsitems,anchor_block,tree_metadata,verification_instructions, andclient_librariesitems do not. This inconsistency allows arbitrary extra properties in nested structures, which could be problematic for a cryptographic proof schema where strict validation is important.Example fix for siblings items
"properties": { "position": { "type": "string", "enum": ["left", "right"], "description": "Position of this sibling relative to the current node in the path." }, "hash": { "type": "string", "pattern": "^0x[a-fA-F0-9]{64}$", "description": "Hash value of the sibling node." } - } + }, + "additionalProperties": false },Apply the same pattern to
anchor_block,tree_metadata,verification_instructions, andclient_librariesitems.operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/schemas/v1/audit-event.json (2)
189-191: IP format restricts to IPv4 only.The
src_endpoint.ipanddst_endpoint.ipfields use"format": "ipv4", which will fail validation for IPv6 addresses. Modern infrastructure commonly uses IPv6.Proposed fix using oneOf for dual-stack support
"ip": { "type": "string", - "format": "ipv4" + "oneOf": [ + { "format": "ipv4" }, + { "format": "ipv6" } + ] },Alternatively, consider removing the format constraint and using a pattern that matches both, or simply
"format": "ip-address"if your validator supports it (note: not standard in JSON Schema, may need custom format).Also applies to: 213-215
78-127: Nested objects lackadditionalProperties: false.Similar to other schemas in this PR, deeply nested objects (e.g.,
metadata.product,actor.user,actor.session,http_request.url, etc.) do not restrict additional properties while the root does. For audit logging schemas where data integrity matters, consider applying consistent strictness.operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/schemas/v1/bias-fingerprint.json (1)
1-219: Schema structure is well-designed.The bias fingerprint schema has comprehensive coverage of provenance tracking, bias identification, algorithmic context, and chain of custody. The required fields, enums, and patterns are appropriately constrained.
As noted in other schemas in this PR, nested objects (e.g.,
known_biasesitems,feature_importanceitems,evaluation_criteriaitems,chain_of_custodyitems) lackadditionalProperties: false. Consider applying consistent strictness across all nested structures if strict validation is desired.operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/schemas/v1/chitty-score.json (1)
132-177:ScoreDimensiondefinition should includeadditionalProperties: false.The
ScoreDimensiondefinition is reused by all four trust dimensions (personal, legal, state, ethics). WithoutadditionalProperties: false, each dimension object can contain arbitrary extra properties, inconsistent with the root schema's strictness.Proposed fix
"ScoreDimension": { "type": "object", "description": "A single dimension of the composite trust score.", "required": ["value"], "properties": { "value": { ... }, ... "last_updated": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time", "description": "When this specific dimension was last recalculated." } - } + }, + "additionalProperties": false }operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/schemas/v1/justice-override.json (2)
248-251: Clarify relationship between duplicatecommitted_atfields.Both
ledger_commitment.committed_at(line 248) andtimestamps.committed_at(line 270) exist. While they may represent the same event, having the same field name in two locations could cause confusion or data inconsistency if they diverge.Consider either:
- Documenting that these should always be identical, or
- Removing one in favor of a single source of truth, or
- Renaming one (e.g.,
ledger_committed_at) to clarify the distinction if they differ.Also applies to: 269-271
1-12: Well-structured schema for capturing human override events.The schema comprehensively covers the override workflow: original decision context, actor authorization with delegation chains, structured justification with evidence, outcome comparison, learning directives, and ledger anchoring. The enum values for roles, categories, and decision types provide good constraints.
Same note as other schemas: nested objects in items (e.g.,
delegation_chain,evidence_attachments,dissenting_opinions,parameter_adjustments) lackadditionalProperties: false.operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/api/openapi.yaml (3)
250-254: Consider addingmaxItemsconstraint to the warnings array.The
warningsarray lacks amaxItemsconstraint. While server-controlled, defining bounds in the API contract helps client implementations allocate appropriate resources and sets clear expectations.♻️ Proposed fix
warnings: type: array + maxItems: 50 items: type: string description: Any warnings about the submitted data (e.g., potential bias detected).
192-195: Permissive payload schema limits validation.The
payloadobject withadditionalProperties: trueprovides flexibility for varied event types but means no schema-level validation of event-specific data. This is acceptable for extensibility, but consider documenting expected payload structures perevent_typeelsewhere (e.g., in supplementary documentation or as JSON Schema definitions) to help API consumers.
712-778: Consider addingmaxItemsto the precedents array.Similar to the warnings array, the
precedentsarray in the response schema (line 772-774) lacks amaxItemsconstraint. Thelimitparameter caps the request, but documenting the maximum in the response schema makes the contract explicit.♻️ Proposed fix
precedents: type: array + maxItems: 100 items: $ref: '#/components/schemas/JusticeOverride'
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/README.mdoperators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/api/openapi.yamloperators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/config-manifest.jsonoperators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/schemas/v1/audit-event.jsonoperators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/schemas/v1/bias-fingerprint.jsonoperators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/schemas/v1/chitty-score.jsonoperators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/schemas/v1/justice-override.jsonoperators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/schemas/v1/merkle-proof.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/api/openapi.yaml
[high] 1-971: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
[high] 1-971: Ensure that security operations is not empty.
(CKV_OPENAPI_5)
[medium] 251-257: Ensure that arrays have a maximum number of items
(CKV_OPENAPI_21)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/README.md
9-9: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
61-61: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/schemas/v1/chitty-score.json (1)
123-130: External schema references are correctly aligned.The
$refURIs forbias_fingerprintandintegrity_proofmatch the$idvalues defined in the corresponding schema files in this PR. This ensures proper schema resolution.operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/config-manifest.json (2)
11-16: Verify the mixed TLDs in registry URLs.The
connectUrlandledgerUrluse.ccTLD whiletrustEngineUrlandidentityUrluse.osTLD. Please confirm this is intentional (e.g., different service domains for different infrastructure components) rather than a typo.
27-95: Well-structured operator manifest.The new sections (
api,schemas,security,integrations,monitoring) are comprehensive and well-organized. The schema definitions properly reference the local JSON schema files, and the monitoring configuration follows Kubernetes conventions for health/readiness probes.operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/api/openapi.yaml (3)
57-88: Security schemes are well-defined.The three-tier security model (mTLS for service-to-service, OAuth2/OIDC for users, API keys for automation) follows security best practices. The granular OAuth scopes appropriately separate read/write/admin privileges across different functional areas.
450-556: Trust score endpoint is well-designed.The dual-mode response using
oneOfwithChittyScoreandBluePillScorecorrectly models the Blue Pill/Red Pill transparency modes. The dimension filtering and trend analysis parameters appropriately scope to Red Pill mode only.
148-161: All external schema file references exist and are valid.The referenced files (
bias-fingerprint.json,chitty-score.json,justice-override.json,merkle-proof.json) in../schemas/v1/all exist and contain valid JSON. The relative paths are correctly resolved from the API directory. No issues with these references.operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/README.md (2)
1-74: Comprehensive and well-structured documentation.The README provides excellent coverage of the operator's architecture, features, and usage. The ASCII diagram clearly illustrates the system layers, and the schema documentation aligns with the OpenAPI specification.
235-239: All related documentation links are valid. The referenced files (CHARTER.md, SECRETS_PROVISIONING.md, and ChittyOS-CICD-SOPs.md) exist at the repository root, so the relative paths in lines 235-239 resolve correctly.
✏️ Tip: You can disable this entire section by setting review_details to false in your review settings.
Add top-level security block that requires ChittyID_OAuth or ApiKey authentication for all endpoints by default. Health endpoints retain explicit security: [] override to remain publicly accessible for monitoring and Kubernetes probes.
Add required array (entity_id, score, status) and additionalProperties: false to BluePillScore schema. This ensures ChittyScore (Red Pill) and BluePillScore (Blue Pill) are mutually exclusive for proper oneOf validation in generated SDKs and response validators.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/api/openapi.yaml`:
- Around line 888-931: The response exposes continuation_token but the request
can't accept it; add a query parameter named continuation_token to the
/ledger/audit operation parameters so clients can page: declare a new parameter
with name "continuation_token", in "query", schema type "string" (nullable if
desired), and a description like "Cursor for pagination, return value from
previous response"; update the operation parameters list near the existing
"operation_type", "from", "to", and "limit" entries so the server can accept the
token on subsequent requests.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/api/openapi.yaml (1)
488-501: Constraindimensionsarray to prevent duplicates/unbounded input.Add
maxItemsanduniqueItemssince the enum has only four values. This also aligns with common OpenAPI validation expectations.♻️ Proposed diff
- name: dimensions in: query schema: type: array items: type: string enum: - personal - legal - state - ethics + maxItems: 4 + uniqueItems: true style: form explode: false description: Filter to specific dimensions (Red Pill mode only).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/README.mdoperators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/api/openapi.yaml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/README.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
operators/chitty-cloud-repo-operator/api/openapi.yaml
[high] 1-982: Ensure that security operations is not empty.
(CKV_OPENAPI_5)
[medium] 257-263: Ensure that arrays have a maximum number of items
(CKV_OPENAPI_21)
✏️ Tip: You can disable this entire section by setting review_details to false in your review settings.
Enable cursor-based pagination by accepting the continuation_token returned from previous responses as a query parameter.
Implement complete technical specification for the CCRO including:
JSON Schemas (v1):
OpenAPI 3.1 Specification:
Updated config-manifest.json with schema registry and capabilities
Documentation with architecture overview and usage guide
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.