release: v0.22.0

[baezor]

Summary

• New Spanish blog post: "19 jóvenes con discapacidad se graduaron en el Senado de la República"
• 4 event photos in src/assets/senado/
• Embedded YouTube video of the graduation ceremony
• SEO optimized with FAQ structured data, links to prepain.mx, and LinkedIn profiles
• Version bump to 0.22.0

Test plan

• npm run build passes
• CI checks passed on feature PR feat: add blog post about Prepa IN graduation at the Senate #43
• Production deployment succeeds

[cloudflare-workers-and-pages]

Deploying baezor with    Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit:	0324308
Status:	✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL:	https://4263733f.baezor.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL:	https://release-v0-22-0.baezor.pages.dev

View logs

[claude]

Code Review: Release v0.22.0

Overview

This PR adds a Spanish blog post about the Prepa IN graduation ceremony at the Senate, along with 4 event photos and a version bump to 0.22.0.

⚠️ Critical Issues

1. BLOCKING: Wrong Base Branch

• Issue: This release PR targets main directly, violating the GitFlow workflow defined in CLAUDE.md
• Required: According to CLAUDE.md section "Workflow (GitFlow)":
  • Release branches should be created from develop
  • After testing, they merge to main (with version tag) AND back to develop
  • Regular PRs should target develop, not main
• Action Required:
  1. Close this PR
  2. Ensure develop branch has these changes
  3. Create a new release PR that merges to main from develop
  4. After merging to main, merge back to develop

2. Missing CI Verification

• Issue: PR description shows incomplete test plan - "Production deployment succeeds" is unchecked
• Required: According to CLAUDE.md "After Creating a PR" section, you must:
  • ✅ Wait for all CI checks (Visual Regression, Lighthouse, Claude Review)
  • ✅ Address any Claude Code Review feedback
  • ✅ Verify visual regression tests pass or update snapshots if changes are intentional
  • ✅ Review Lighthouse CI scores for performance/accessibility/SEO
• Action Required: Wait for CI checks to complete and address any failures before merging

📝 Code Quality & Best Practices

Blog Post (graduacion-prepa-in-senado-de-la-republica.md)

Strengths:

• ✅ Well-structured frontmatter matching schema in src/content/config.ts:9-26
• ✅ Proper use of optional fields (categories, tags, metaDescription, keywords, contentType, lang, faqs)
• ✅ Good SEO optimization with FAQ structured data for AEO
• ✅ Appropriate use of contentType: "personal-essay"
• ✅ Correct image references using relative paths to src/assets/
• ✅ Good use of external links to LinkedIn profiles and prepain.mx
• ✅ YouTube embed follows standard iframe pattern
• ✅ Content is well-written, personal, and engaging

Minor Suggestions:

1. Image Optimization Consideration

   • Current: Standard markdown images ![alt text](path)
   • Consider: Using Astro's <Image> component for automatic optimization (AVIF/WebP conversion)
   • According to CLAUDE.md: "Images: Use import + Astro's <Image> component for automatic optimization"
   • Note: This is optional for .md files, but worth considering for performance

2. Iframe Accessibility

   • The YouTube iframe has frameborder="0" (deprecated in HTML5)
   • Modern approach: Use CSS border: none instead
   • Consider adding loading="lazy" for performance

Images (src/assets/senado/)

Concerns:

1. Inconsistent File Naming

   • Files: 9.JPG, 10.JPG, 14.JPG, 1770752219179.jpeg
   • Issue: Mixed extensions (.JPG vs .jpeg), numeric timestamp filename
   • Recommendation: Use descriptive names like graduacion-ceremonia.jpg, equipo-prepa-in.jpg, etc.
   • This improves maintainability and SEO (alt text references)

2. Case Sensitivity

   • Extension .JPG (uppercase) may cause issues on case-sensitive systems
   • Recommendation: Use lowercase .jpg consistently

3. File Size Unknown

   • Cannot verify if images are optimized for web
   • Recommendation: Ensure images are compressed/optimized before committing
   • Large unoptimized images hurt Lighthouse performance scores

Version Bump (package.json)

Looks Good:

• ✅ Version increment from 0.21.0 to 0.22.0 is appropriate for a new feature (blog post)
• ✅ Follows semantic versioning (minor version bump)

🔒 Security

No Issues Detected:

• ✅ All external links are to reputable sources (LinkedIn, YouTube, prepain.mx, twitter/X)
• ✅ YouTube iframe uses standard embed with appropriate permissions
• ✅ No hardcoded credentials or sensitive data
• ✅ No XSS vulnerabilities in the markdown content

🎯 Performance Considerations

1. YouTube Embed Performance

   • Consider using lite-youtube-embed or similar for faster initial page load
   • YouTube iframes are heavy (~500KB of resources)
   • Alternative: Add a thumbnail with play button that loads iframe on click

2. Image Loading

   • Consider adding loading="lazy" to image tags if Astro doesn't add it automatically
   • Will improve initial page load time

🧪 Test Coverage

Concerns:

1. Visual Regression Tests

   • Adding 4 new images and a blog post will likely trigger visual changes
   • According to CLAUDE.md: "Run npm run test:visual before committing UI changes"
   • If tests fail and changes are intentional, run npm run test:visual:update
   • Action Required: Verify visual regression tests pass or update baselines

2. Missing Test Plan Items

   • PR description shows CI checks passed on feature PR feat: add blog post about Prepa IN graduation at the Senate #43, but:
   • No mention of visual regression test results
   • No mention of Lighthouse CI scores
   • Production deployment is unchecked

📊 Commit Convention

Looks Good:

• ✅ Feature commit: feat: add blog post about Prepa IN graduation at the Senate
• ✅ Release commit: release: bump version to 0.22.0
• ✅ Both follow the commitlint convention defined in CLAUDE.md

🎨 Content Quality

Excellent:

• ✅ Engaging personal narrative style
• ✅ Clear structure with headings
• ✅ Good use of links to external resources
• ✅ FAQ section adds value for SEO and reader understanding
• ✅ Social media links at the end for further engagement
• ✅ Proper Spanish language throughout (matches lang: es)

📋 Verdict: Request Changes

Must Fix Before Merging:

1. ❌ CRITICAL: Fix base branch - should follow GitFlow workflow (develop → main, not direct to main)
2. ❌ Wait for all CI checks to complete and pass
3. ❌ Verify visual regression tests pass or intentionally update baselines
4. ⚠️ Consider renaming image files to be more descriptive and use lowercase extensions

Nice to Have:

• Consider optimizing image file sizes before committing
• Consider using lite-youtube-embed for better performance
• Consider using Astro <Image> component for automatic optimization

📚 References

Per CLAUDE.md:

• Workflow (GitFlow) section - PRs should target develop, not main
• "After Creating a PR" section - must check CI results before merging
• Visual Regression Testing section - must run tests before committing UI changes

---

Overall Assessment: Good content and proper structure, but the PR violates the GitFlow workflow by targeting main directly. Please follow the release workflow defined in CLAUDE.md.