Draft
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Contributor
|
👍 will you also switch the URLs to paths vs query params in this PR? |
Member
Author
|
@davidmytton yeah that's the goal |
This was referenced Jan 8, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
WIP
e45f20d
Introduce the routes and convince myself (via a playwright test) that the content was identical or just about identical. Some spacing has changed as we've removed a number of
<div>wrappers. Disregard the framework switchers and next/prev links. Those will be sorted out in future commits.Arcjet folks you can download the playwright report here (too large for GitHub) and review the diff yourself. It didn't make sense to keep this transitive test around in the repo.
Messy source code of the test