Adding sequential pipetting #871
Open
+81
−2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…er.py Implement sequential operation handling for liquid aspiration. Worked on reality Hamilton run.
Commented out the ValueError raise statement and added logic to return the center for sequential pipetting.
I ran python -m ruff format liquid_handler.py to change the original code into the format requested in linting.
This reverts commit c36bbcc.
Used the rc file /pyproject.toml this time.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently when aspirating from the same resource for all channels, the liquid handler will assume the user would like all pipettes to go into the resource well in one operation. However, when the resource well is too small, it raises a ValueError ("Resource is too small to space channels."). This causes a problem when doing assembly plates where one might aspirate from the same resource well (small 96-plate), but dispensing into different destination wells.
I used Chatgpt to write some code which detects whether it can go into the resource well in one operation and if not it goes into the sequential fallback which will process the list of aspirations as individual operations. I have tested this on a Hamilton STARlet with an internal protocol, but please test this using other wet lab protocols.