-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 637
[18.0][ADD] base_tier_validation_confirm_auth #1213
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: 18.0
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[18.0][ADD] base_tier_validation_confirm_auth #1213
Conversation
2cc208a to
8777a22
Compare
8777a22 to
41d98d1
Compare
LoisRForgeFlow
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, functional test and code review 👍
|
@pedrobaeza @etobella What do you think? |
|
From a technical perspective it look Ok, for testing it functionally, I need to do it from a local environment, I will check it |
pedrobaeza
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
About the name, I would follow from left to right the process flow, and short it, so I would call it base_tier_validation_confirm_auth.
LauraCForgeFlow
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Functional + code review LGTM!
|
This PR has the |
41d98d1 to
737f99c
Compare
|
@pedrobaeza changed the name to base_tier_validation_confirm_auth as suggested! |
737f99c to
7e6444f
Compare
|
OK, thanks. Waiting for Enric's confirmation to merge. |
etobella
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested with other kinds of authentication, like passkey.
Worked like a charm
/ocabot merge nobump
|
On my way to merge this fine PR! |
|
@etobella your merge command was aborted due to failed check(s), which you can inspect on this commit of 18.0-ocabot-merge-pr-1213-by-etobella-bump-nobump. After fixing the problem, you can re-issue a merge command. Please refrain from merging manually as it will most probably make the target branch red. |
|
@etobella the merge command failed, and the error seems not to be related with my module, could you try again, please? |
|
Can you rebase first? |
7e6444f to
c20f734
Compare
|
@etobella done! |
|
there is something wrong there. Probably related to a translation made. Can you check it? 🙏 |
|
@etobella The error is related with a bad translation from base module, I created a pr trying to solve this. |
Added a new module base_tier_validation_authentication_confirm that allows us setting an authentication confirmation during the tier validation process. The system will ask the user to authenticate himself in order to validate or reject the review. If the comment option is enabled, the password confirmation will be requested after the comment wizard.
Depends on -> #1217