Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
|
I don't feel the .note format gives any real advantage over PDF for this use case. Why not just use PDF? I don't understand. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
I am trying to work out a flow where I would like access to my obsidian notes on the supernote, using the supernote file-manager and applications. (using a side loaded obsidian app does not allow for a nice joined up flow and exporting to pdf and manually use the pdf as a .note template does not work for me either)
I think to enable the most useful solution I would like to be able to take an existing .md file or multiple files (directory) and export them to a supernote .note. Allowing me to read and annotate these files on the supernote. (.md content applied as template)
A workaround could be to use a pdf file as input into this solution. (.md -> .pdf -> .note)
Since I assume you understand the .note format quite well, I was wondering if it would be possible for your current solution to (relatively) easily support this, very much open to suggestions or should I look elsewhere? (pysn?)
Best regards,
Edwin
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions