Skip to content

[bodemlagen_pwn_2024] Missing information #25

@bdestombe

Description

@bdestombe
  • Check Vincent's okay before uploading bodemlagen report. Agreed.
  • Provide a mask for which the bodemlagen here provide better information than REGISII. We need to know where to use bodemlagen_pwn_2024 and where REGIS. With the current provided data we cannot make the distinction whether a layer is knowingly missing or that it falls outside the region of interest. Bergen and Koster mask marks where the layer is not present within the study area.
  • Check bodemlagen_pwn_regis_koppeltabel.
  • Merging of DS21 and DS21_0. No. In the Eem formatie are two clay layers present. S21_0 will be renamed to S20, is located in the top of the Eem formatie. Then 20m sand before the top of the S21. Koppeltabel aanpassen: EEK1 (of BEk1/2?)=S20 and EEK2=S21 -> Vincent doet de check. W21 opsplitsen in W20 en W21 en koppeltabel daarop aanpassen.
  • Only seem to have looked at aquitards. What needs to be done for the aquifers? Vincent looks at botms af Bergen aquifers.
  • Check basis aquitards for Bergen region is translated to top aquitards? Vincent's product only contains top of aquitards.
  • bodemlagen_pwn_nhdz/v1.0.0/Bodemparams/Cwaarden_aquitards/DWAT_Boringen_Selectie.shp contains elevations and resistivities not included in the interpolation points.
  • .

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions